If you abandon religious principles, could mankind exist? Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing….
God is -- and God is unknown. What is good about this? There is very little mention of Jesus by the Romans and what is mentioned suggests he was just another religious zealot that happened to get executed.
Made of the full cloth? Dawkins does not suffer any kind of discrimination because he is an atheist, nor is he shunned by relgious people at least not the more liberal sort. To all intents John is an atheist. In the Jewish view, Jesus cannot save souls; only God can.
There is nothing good to say about the hi-jacking and forced amalgamation of constructive organized disbelief Humanism into atheism. Popularly, the word agnostic has been corrupted just as the words Atheist and Epicurian have been corrupted to mean to the man in the street, "I don't know whether there is a god or not.
Some have sacred texts and writings; some have traditions passed down through generations. I said that there is another sense in which every man does as he pleases. It merely opposes the Christian religion, just as Mohammedanism does. Moreover, how many fundamentalist theists ever seriously evaluate other religions, religious texts, cultures, so-called divine experiences of other religions, etc?
A perfect and all knowing God should have made it so that even the proverbial "village idiot" should be able to find Him--and that is clearly not the case. Of course, if the inerrent Bible is true, how could Moses have written of his own death in Deuteronomy?
As previously shown theism, and atheism describe belief. Most claim their "sacred text" is divinely inspired yet most do not hold up to scrutiny. By now I had not gone to church for many years, but still, out of fear of Hell, I thought it safer to say I believed than risk an eternity of damnation.
People can be good without God just as people can be bad with God. Log in to post comments By derek not verified on 10 Jun permalink That removes any value from the word agnostic, as far as I am concerned In this context, he's talking about the Christian God only, hence the qualifier "for practical purposes".
Eastern religions seem to make more sense because if they posit a deity at all—some would say Buddhism is nontheistic —it is one that permeates everything.
I was told that the Bible was the flawless and perfect word of God, that God sent his Son to die for me, and that by believing in Him I would be saved from eternal damnation.
Dawkins 1 to 7 point scale is a better approximation of how to describe ones viewpoint but it is still rather cumbersome. All have had leaders and members who lie, cheat, steal, kill, etc. He was -- by most accounts -- fine, but an examination to check for a concussion also revealed a lump just below his throat.
Which text is right? I observe that a very large portion of the human race does not believe in God and suffers no visible punishment in consequence.
Of course being an atheist can have political consequences but PZ essentially takes the same position on atheism as Dawkins and Moran do, neither of whom live in the US. It's not so much that I have a "soft spot" in my heart for religion I do ; the fact of the matter is that I am amazed by the moral organizing principle that a myth provides!
The present essay is included for archival reasons only. To me, these stories are nearly sacred and defy naturalistic explanations. As for heaven, there might conceivably someday be evidence of its existence through spiritualism, but most agnostics do not think that there is such evidence, and therefore do not believe in heaven.
I realize that this cannot be proven, but so what? Still, I was years away from agnosticism and had a lot of questions, uncertainties, and doubts. The problem is that the general public just doesn't know about what is entailed by these theories, and many amateur apologists don't know either.
I think, re-reading this after 40 years, that we might suggest that those who think they are atheists, mean or otherwise, mostly are agnostics who are merely mislabelled… What Is an agnostic?Faith: Essays from Believers, Agnostics, and Atheists Faith: Noun - Essays from Believers, Agnostics, and Atheists.
Victoria Zackheim. Soft cover. Delve into this thought-provoking collection of personal essays from Why I’m Not an Atheist: The Case for Agnosticism Essay Why I’m Not an Atheist: The Case for Agnosticism Essay.
Skeptics consist of atheists, humanists, agnostics, and deists. I know of skeptics that reject atheism but I can't name any that openly defy atheism.
Skeptics don't want to rock the boat (or subject themselves to the atheist "buzz saw") and thus accommo date atheism. Atheist reject all knowledge which is not scientifically proven. To the atheist, belief in something unproven or unseen is illogical.
Atheists hold that a person who believes in the existence of one God is himself an atheist. Jun 10, · But I’m as confident as I can be that it isn’t going to happen – which is why I call myself an atheist, and not an agnostic. #3 Chris' Wills June 10, Why I'm Agnostic () B. Steven Matthies. The decision to choose agnosticism over Christianity was not an easy choice.
In fact, it has taken me over 20 years to finally reach this point. Like many in my family, I was required to attend a parochial Lutheran school until the seventh grade. An atheist merely has to say at a bare minimum, "The existence of god is unlikely, so I'm willing to say I don't believe in god," whereas the agnostic says, "I have no idea if god exists.
It is unknowable.".Download